Ultimately, the political determination of the parties involved is whether a contract becomes a dead letter or a source of action. For Israel and Vae, the rationale for the agreement stems from their strong focus on two fronts: marginalizing the region`s most destabilizing forces, amid fears of a gradual withdrawal of the United States and the removal of barriers between two of the most globalized and technologically concentrated countries in the Middle East. This logic led the Minister of state of the Emirates, Anwar Gargash, to publicly declare that he was planning a «warm peace» and that Israel was certainly trying to further dissolve its regional isolation. But if the political determination of one of the two parties increases for whatever reason, even the best text will not be able to advance peace. The News International reported that Pakistan, after consultation and consideration of the pros and cons of the evolution of Pakistan`s national interests, would take a position on Israel`s water-of-life agreement. Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi avoided speaking on the sensitive issue. [85] Jared Kushner, a senior adviser to the President of the United States, condemned Kuwait`s position. However, according to Al Jazeera, his conviction was widely shared on the Internet as positive. [53] However, the Government of Kuwait itself has remained silent on the agreement. On 18 August, 37 Kuwaiti MPs asked them to condemn the agreement. [54] Two days earlier, the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Qabas, citing unnamed government sources, had indicated that the Kuwaiti government`s position vis-à-vis Israel was unchanged. [55] Beijing is not under pressure to act quickly or courageously on the Abraham Accords.

As with countries around the world, China has not yet fully realized the impact of the agreements. There is no doubt that Beijing officials will closely monitor the way agreements are conducted at the regional level. Chinese leaders will do everything in their power to reduce any perceived risks to Beijing of formalizing Israel`s relations with Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates, while striving to make full use of the opportunities that the agreement could offer. Israel`s place in the region. The United Arab Emirates Agreement contains a passage on how Arabs and Jews are «from the same ancestor, Abraham,» and that they are both from the Middle East. Such a formulation is important because it clearly refutes the Arab world`s long-standing assertions that Zionism is foreign to the region. Malaysia stated that the agreement was a sovereign right of the United Arab Emirates, but that it would continue to support Israel`s withdrawal from the Palestinian territories. [128] The Philippine Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement in which it welcomed the agreement and hoped it would contribute to peace and security in the Middle East. [129] The standardization agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, officially the Abraham Agreement: Peace Treaty, Diplomatic Relations and Complete Normalization between the United Arab Emirates and the State of Israel[1] was initially agreed in a joint declaration by the United States, Israel and the United Arab Emirates (United Arab Emirates) on August 13, 2020, officially known as the Abraham Agreement. [2] The United Arab Emirates was the third Arab country after Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994 to agree to formally normalize relations with Israel[3][5][5], as well as the first Country in the Persian Gulf to do so. [6] [7] At the same time, Israel has agreed to suspend plans to annex parts of the West Bank. [6] [8] The agreement has normalized informal but robust external relations between the two countries for a long time.

[9] [10] The agreement was signed at the White House on September 15, 2020. [11] It was unanimously approved by the Israeli cabinet on 12 October[12] and ratified by the Knesset on 15 October. [13] The United Arab Emirates Parliament and Cabinet ratified the agreement on 19 October.